asp.net gs1 128

asp.net gs1 128

asp.net ean 128

asp.net gs1 128

asp.net gs1 128

asp.net ean 128,

asp.net ean 128,

asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,

asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,

asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,

asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net ean 128,
asp.net gs1 128,
asp.net ean 128,

We create a lib directory as a subdirectory of t ourselves. You ll usually want to start testing so that your application data is identical at the beginning of every test run. The best way of doing this is by including a file, as it simplifies configuration of your test suite and allows you to set up reasonable defaults (or scaffolding). The following is an example of such a script. A sensible name is inc.pl and a sensible location is inside the application s t/lib directory. use strict; use warnings; # chdir to the dir the test directory. Now we always know where we are # relative to other files. BEGIN { use FindBin qw/$Bin/; # test script dir chdir $Bin if -d $Bin; # Include our application dir and our own lib dir use lib "$Bin/../lib"; use lib "$Bin/lib"; # Set up the testing config. # Note, because this is included in the script in t/ FindBin finds the # location of the test script, not this inc.pl script. $ENV{CATALYST_CONFIG} = "$Bin/lib/myapp.conf"; } # load the application in -- it's something we have to do for *every* test use Catalyst::Test 'MyApp';

. A .

The terms light litigation and heavy litigation are often used to describe the natural state of documents prior to collection. These terms have been created because they help a harvesting team estimate the cost and effort required to organize and manage documents. An ideal set of documents is free of blemishes, consists of typewritten text, is well ordered (perhaps organized by date), and has well-defined document boundaries (each document is terminated by a separator page, or each document is stored in a separate folder). Documents of this type are known as light litigation and are relatively easy to manage. Conversely, documents that are jumbled together in no logical order; that consist mainly of handwritten text, or that have handwritten notes in the margins of pages (known as marginalia); or that have been bound by heavy staples or blinder clips are known as heavy litigation. If the collected paper is destined for a full-text information retrieval system, it must be scanned by a software program. This process creates digital representations of the source material. In many circumstances, the scanning also attempts to recognize text displayed on the paper using a process known as Optical Character Recognition (OCR). The accuracy of this process ultimately determines the accuracy of retrieval: a botched OCR procedure can result in malformed results that are dissimilar from the source material. Even if the OCR procedure is flawless, the source material itself might contain flaws perhaps there are stains or the paper is ragged so the converted OCR text will be inaccurate. In general, light litigation comes through OCR with accuracy and heavy litigation doesn t. The better the input, the better the output.

XML PLS ... 03/02/00 11/09/00 ... Dallas Dallas ... T A . . . . . . . . . A . . . A . A . . . T . . A . . . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

# make the Dump() sub available in every test for debugging output use YAML qw/Dump/; use vars qw/ $User $Passwd $Mech /; # a rare use of global variables in perl. # Set up a ready to use TWMC use Test::WWW::Mechanize::Catalyst; $Mech = Test::WWW::Mechanize::Catalyst->new( catalyst_app => 'MyApp' ); # login credentials for all testing code $User = 'test'; $Passwd = 'test'; 1; Now in our regular test script, we ll have the following at the top of the file: use strict; use warnings; use Test::More 'no_plan'; BEGIN { use FindBin; require "$FindBin::Bin/lib/inc.pl"; use_ok 'MyApp::Controller::Root'; } my $req = POST '/login', [ user => $User, pass => $Passwd ]; ok( $req, "Testing match: " . $req->uri ); Here s the exciting new feature of Catalyst::Test. As well as an HTTP::Response object, we can obtain a context object (i.e., ref($c) eq 'MyApp'), which makes it much easier to inspect the internal state of our $c object at the end of each request than has been possible in the past. my ($res,$c) = ctx_request( $req ); ok( $res, " Requested " . $req->uri ); ok( $res->is_success, " Request succeeded" ); ok( $c->stash->{message}, " Diagnostic message recorded" ); ok( $c->stash->{result}, " Stash filled" );